Today I wrote a Letter to SCOTUS about the Mandates and 6th Circuit Appeal:

Supreme Court of the United States

1 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20543

RE: Vaccine Mandates; 6th Circuit Appeal

Dear SCOTUS,

I am writing to you as a descendant of Judge Coursey who was one of Maryland's first judges and my ancestors who fought for our Constitution and freedom of our Nation in the Revolution, and all subsequent wars. By trade, I am an HR Professional and former Legislative Chair of the Lake Washington Human Resources Association. I am here writing to fight for the Constitution and Citizens today. 

I would like the Court to remember and consider the following guarantees, the Agreement between this government and its Citizen: 

1.) Freedom of Speech - the Founders did not provide this Amendment for the comfort of the Government. It provided it for the protection of Citizens and for purposes of Enlightenment (the age from which they came from). Any platform incorporated under the Laws of the US ought to uphold it and discontinue their censorship and deplatforming of Dissenters of official narratives. It is only through debate and many perspectives that an Enlightened Citizenry and Scientific Expert Minds, free to congress and review evidence can keep the Nation strong and alive. Without all kinds of perspectives and Minds like Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, born out of the Enlightenment, we wouldn’t have this Nation, to begin with.

2.) Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure from Extrajudicial action and the subversion of the courts. No governor, mayor, government agency or Council has the right to implement an extrajudicial house arrest, execution, or otherwise. Again, this Amendment is not to be construed to protect the government. It is to be liberally construed to protect the Citizens. 

3.) Amendment VI. I hear today that NY state would like to indefinitely hold Citizens without due process. I believe that NY is planning to violate the VI Amendment. 


4.) The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. We the People and the States have the Right to determine what happens to us. The Constitution does not delegate management of health or disease to any branch of government and explicitly advocates for Natural Rights and Individual Sovereignty (bodily autonomy). No branch of government is given authority and it cannot exercise or convey authority thereof. 

5.) AMENDMENT XIII - Slavery means that the people residing here do not have control of their bodies or the ability to determine their future, economically or otherwise. The Amendment states:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

When the people no matter their race, color, creed, origin, or other status no longer have control over their bodies or the ability to determine their future, the XIII Amendment is being violated. When employers have the ability to mandate what their workers put into their bodies, they no longer have employees, but slaves. When governments are mandating that Citizens subject their bodies to the public domain, we have slaves, not Citizens. No free person should be mandated to produce their body to the public domain, to induce or otherwise coerce them is Treason.

I implore the SCOTUS to strike down any law that violates the body or economic determinism of the Citizen and I implore you to uphold Natural Rights and Individual Sovereignty as the Constitution advocates. Please, further strike down and invalidate any State Mandates that violate these principles.

I agree with Judge Bush's assessment and opinion when he stated that OSHA cannot be given authority Congress does not possess. Further, COVID does not arise as a hazard arising out of the work place or as a result of work.

Further, it has now come to light that there were specialized interests that asked scientific data modelers to put forth “worst case” scenarios. It has also come to light that alternatives to vaccination were not promoted because it would jeopardize a profit seeking organization’s EUA status. It has come to light that legislators were paid to promote and legislate on behalf of these organizations and policies, a conflict of interest which has led to bodily and economic damage of Citizens, and sometimes death. This is Treason when their own self interest is put ahead of their Constituents best interest and well being; when the Constituents were explicitly and intentionally misled. 

When our hospitals, military, schools, and economy are being dismantled; when the Citizens can no longer pursue life, liberty, and happiness; when are we going to acknowledge that we were sabotaged by an enemy either foreign and or domestic?

I pray that all of this has been ignorance and unintentional and that this Court will set what they can right and back in line with the Constitution and the Spirit of it. 

I believe that there is a simple solution, I believe that the SCOTUS may determine that the matter has already been established in a US v. Berndt precedent and that there is pre-existing statute for lower courts to determine cases from: CFR: Title 45, Part 46.

Sincerely,


Concerned Citizen